The Effects of No-Outdoor-Camping Laws on Homeless Services - casebook

As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices. As a social work professional, you're likely familiar with the impact of homelessness in your community. With rising housing costs, stagnant wages, and limited affordable housing options, more individuals and families are finding themselves without a stable place to call home. In an attempt to address homelessness, many states are implementing "no outdoor camping" laws, or camping bans that prohibit people from sleeping in public spaces. While intended to encourage people to seek shelters and services, these laws often have unintended consequences. Instead, they can make it even harder for people experiencing homelessness to get back on their feet. This article takes an in-depth look at how no-outdoor-camping laws impact homeless populations and create new challenges for the service providers who are working tirelessly to help. We'll also explore alternative solutions and best practices.

Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness. Before discussing the effects of no-outdoor-camping laws, it's important to understand the basics of these policies and how they're being implemented in cities across the country. Overview and Purpose Also known as urban camping bans, these laws make it illegal for people to sleep or camp in public spaces like parks, sidewalks, major roads, or vacant lots. Violators face fines, arrests, and/or having their belongings confiscated by law-enforcement officials. Several states, like Texas, Tennessee, and Missouri, have implemented statewide camping bans, while Tennessee has made it a felony to camp on public property. Supporters of these camping bans argue that they're necessary to curb illegal activities and address public health and safety concerns. They say that allowing encampments enables people to remain homeless and restricting camping will instead push people to engage with shelters and services. However, critics say no-outdoor-camping laws criminalize homelessness, as people have no choice but to sleep outside when they can't access affordable housing or shelter. Legal Framework and Enforcement The legality of no-outdoor-camping laws has been challenged in court multiple times. In the 2018 case Martin v. City of Boise, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it unconstitutional to enforce a camping ban when a city does not have enough shelter beds available for its homeless population. However, without one uniform system, this has resulted in a variety of approaches across different jurisdictions, leading to a patchwork of local policies. Some cities, like Austin, Texas, have passed more specific ordinances designating particular areas off-limits to camping, such as areas near homeless shelters or in high-wildfire-risk zones. Others, like Denver, have coupled their camping bans with sanctioned campsites that provide a legal place for people to sleep and access services. Thus, enforcement of these camping laws varies widely. Police may give warnings before making arrests, and cities will often conduct "sweeps" to clear encampments, throwing away people's tents and belongings in the process. However, without sufficient shelter or storage options, this often perpetuates the cycle of homelessness.

As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine. As mentioned earlier, while intended to address homelessness, no-outdoor-camping laws often have severe negative consequences for those experiencing homelessness. Let's take a closer look at how these policies impact homeless populations. Vulnerability Homeless people face numerous threats to their health and safety, and no-outdoor-camping laws only worsen these vulnerabilities. For example, a study showed that encampment sweeps disrupt the stability and community some homeless people have created for themselves. Without their personal property, people are even more exposed to the weather and face a higher risk of hypothermia and other health issues. Another study showed that involuntary displacement of the homeless population also leads to increased overdoses, hospitalizations, and mortality rates. Accessibility to Services Proponents stress that no-outdoor-camping laws encourage people to utilize shelters and services, but the reality is often the opposite. Even when shelter beds are available, many barriers prevent people from accessing them, including: Most shelters have strict curfews and rules against substance use that don't work for everyone. Couples and families can be separated. People with service animals or emotional support pets may be turned away from certain locations. LGBTQ+ individuals and abuse survivors may not feel safe in such an environment. Permanent supportive housing is even harder to come by for the homeless population. Due to a lack of funding and community opposition, the supply of affordable housing with wraparound services doesn't come close to meeting the demand. Without significantly increasing investments in affordable and supportive housing, enforcement-based approaches will likely leave people more vulnerable. Furthermore, being forced to constantly move around makes it difficult for people to keep their case appointments or maintain a routine.

As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans. As someone working in homeless services, you're likely already stretched thin while trying to meet the extensive needs of your clients, and no-outdoor-camping laws create additional challenges that can impact your ability to provide effective support. Service Delivery Models With more unhoused people trying to avoid law enforcement and being pushed to the margins, traditional place-based service delivery models have become less feasible. If your organization relies on people coming to a central location for meals, showers, healthcare, or case management, you may see a drop in utilization after a camping ban goes into effect. Outreach and Engagement Efforts Outreach workers often lack the capacity and resources to cover a large geographic area and track down unhoused individuals. You may need to stretch your budget to cover homeless assistance programs like mobile shower units, storage lockers, or transportation to help people scattered across the city maintain their health and stability. Even with these strategies, it can still take dozens of contacts to build enough trust for someone to accept shelter or housing. Consistency is key, which is made much harder by the constant displacement caused by camping bans.

Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven. Ending homelessness is a complex challenge that requires a multifaceted approach. While no-outdoor-camping laws may be well-intentioned, they often do more harm than good. Here are some promising strategies that service providers like you can advance to make a real impact. Build Partnerships for a Greater Impact Homelessness is often the result of breakdowns in our social safety net and affordable housing system. That's why cross-sector collaboration is critical. Homeless service providers can't do it alone. You need to build partnerships with healthcare, behavioral health, criminal justice, education, employment, and other systems to holistically address the root causes of homelessness. Some communities have seen success with alternative models, like: The Crisis Assistance Helping Out on the Streets (CAHOOTS) program in Eugene, Oregon, dispatches medics and crisis workers to respond to mental health and substance use emergencies. The Homeless Outreach Street Team (HOST) program in Austin pairs police officers with social workers to conduct outreach and connect people to the services they need. The Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD) program in Seattle diverts people who are arrested for low-level offenses to case management instead of jail. Prioritize Getting People Into Permanent Housing Quickly At the end of the day, the only thing that truly ends someone's state of homelessness is a safe, stable, affordable place to call home. That's why the evidence-based Housing First model needs to be at the center of any effective homeless response system. Housing First recognizes that people experiencing homelessness need housing first and foremost, not as a reward for good behavior or sobriety. Quickly connecting people to permanent housing with voluntary supportive services is a proven way to help people exit homelessness and avoid returning to the streets. Some states and localities are getting creative to increase their housing supply by: Purchasing and converting hotels and motels into permanent supportive housing, like California's project "Homekey" Changing zoning laws to allow for more density and infill development Providing incentives for landlords to rent to people exiting homelessness As a service provider, you can advocate for these kinds of housing investments. You can also help your homeless clients navigate the process of getting their documents in order, applying for vouchers and subsidies, and finding a unit to live in. Increase Your Outreach Efforts to Build Trust With or without camping bans, a significant number of unhoused people will remain unsheltered if they aren't proactively engaged. Many have had negative experiences with the homeless system before, from crowded shelters to impersonal staff to endless waitlists. Meeting people where they are is key to building trust. Homeless outreach requires patience, empathy, and a willingness to get creative. Some best practices include: Hiring outreach staff with the lived experience of homelessness Using peers and word of mouth to establish credibility Bringing survival supplies like food, water, socks, and hygiene kits to every interaction Emphasizing client choice and self-determination Being transparent about available resources and timelines Providing transportation to appointments and housing viewings Continuing to follow up after clients are housed to prevent returns to homelessness Regularly Track Data on Homelessness Trends You can't solve a problem you can't see. Regularly collecting, analyzing, and sharing data on homelessness is critical for understanding trends, targeting resources, and measuring progress. An annual point-in-time (PIT) count, while imperfect, provides a snapshot of homelessness in a given community and can help identify any disproportionate impact on certain subpopulations. However, the PIT count has limitations, and it doesn't capture the full scope of homelessness throughout the year. Thus, communities should also invest in a robust homeless management information system (HMIS) that allows service providers to securely share client data and track outcomes over time. This can help identify gaps, justify funding requests, and flag people who may need additional outreach. Some key data points to track include: Number of people experiencing sheltered vs. unsheltered homelessness Demographics (e.g., age, gender, race/ethnicity, veteran status) Entries into and exits from homelessness Length of time spent homeless Returns to homelessness Utilization of shelter, housing, and services In the face of camping bans that displace and hide unhoused people, maintaining quality by-name data is more important than ever. You may need to get creative with strategies like: Using geographic information system (GIS) mapping to track encampments Conducting surveys in meal lines or homeless centers Partnering with schools and hospitals to identify people who are at risk of homelessness before they enter the system Create a Coordinated Entry System Many communities are implementing a coordinated entry system (CES) to make homeless services more efficient and equitable. This means that all service providers use a common assessment tool to triage people's needs and vulnerabilities and then refer them to housing resources based on a transparent prioritization scheme. Under a CES, case managers conduct a standard assessment with every homeless person that identifies their barriers to housing, like a lack of income, a substance use disorder, or a history of evictions. Based on the results, the person would be prioritized for different types of programs, from rapid rehousing subsidies to permanent supportive housing to affordable housing vouchers. Coordinated entry helps communities target their limited resources to the people who need them most. It can also help cut down on people having to tell their stories over and over to different providers and ensures there's "no wrong door" for accessing the homeless system. Some communities in Clark County, Virginia, have even created "by-name lists" of every unhoused person to ensure no one falls through the cracks. Coordinated entry is not a magic solution, though. It still requires significant investments in actual housing and services to back it up, and some criticize the assessment tools for being too invasive. However, when implemented well, coordinated entry can be a powerful way to make homeless services more person-centric and data-driven.

Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships. Anti-camping laws may be a well-intentioned attempt to address homelessness, but they often do more harm than good. They also create new challenges for service providers who are working tirelessly to help people exit homelessness. Constantly displacing and criminalizing unhoused people makes it harder to build trust, maintain contact, and connect people to life-changing resources. Instead of relying solely on enforcement, we need a more holistic and person-centric approach. This means expanding permanent housing options, investing in outreach and supportive services, using data to drive decisions, and building cross-sector partnerships.